**Congresswoman Anna Paulina Luna Drops a Political Bombshell: The Push to Ban Dual Citizens from Congress**

In a move that has sent shockwaves through Washington, Congresswoman Anna Paulina Luna (R-FL) has called for a sweeping ban on dual citizens serving in the United States Congress.

Her demand is clear, uncompromising, and already stirring intense debate: If you hold citizenship in another country, you should not be allowed to wield legislative power in America. Luna’s declaration strikes at the heart of the DC establishment, raising urgent questions about loyalty, national security, and the hidden allegiances of those who write the nation’s laws.

Luna’s proposal is not simply about tightening vetting procedures or increasing transparency. It is about demanding absolute, undivided allegiance to the United States from every member of Congress.

According to Luna, the stakes are too high to allow any ambiguity. In her view, lawmakers must be singularly devoted to American interests, free from any potential influence or pressure from foreign governments. The message is simple: divided loyalties have no place in the halls of power.

The timing of Luna’s announcement is no accident. In recent years, concerns have grown over foreign interference in American politics, from cyber attacks to covert lobbying efforts. The issue of dual citizenship has simmered beneath the surface, rarely addressed openly.

Now, Luna’s call has brought it front and center, forcing both parties to confront uncomfortable truths about who truly represents the American people.

As news of Luna’s demand spreads, speculation is mounting about which lawmakers could be affected. Rumors are swirling that a list of names is already circulating among insiders—a roster of powerful figures whose dual citizenship status might force them out of office if Luna’s proposal gains traction. The implications are enormous: dozens of members could be disqualified, reshaping the balance of power in Congress and triggering a wave of special elections.

Behind the scenes, panic is reportedly setting in—not just among lawmakers, but also among foreign governments with close ties to certain members of Congress. For years, dual citizenship has allowed some politicians to maintain personal and financial connections abroad, raising questions about potential conflicts of interest. Luna’s demand threatens to expose these relationships, forcing politicians to choose between their foreign ties and their American careers.

The evidence that sparked Luna’s bold move is said to include classified reports, whistleblower testimony, and investigative journalism revealing the extent of dual citizenship among elected officials. While the full details remain under wraps, Luna insists that the risk is real and must be addressed immediately. She argues that divided loyalties undermine the integrity of Congress, erode public trust, and create vulnerabilities that hostile powers could exploit.

Critics of Luna’s proposal argue that it is too extreme, warning that it could exclude talented, patriotic Americans who happen to hold dual citizenship for personal or family reasons. They point out that the United States is a nation of immigrants, and that many dual citizens have served honorably in government. However, Luna and her supporters counter that the unique responsibilities of Congress demand a higher standard, and that the potential for divided allegiances cannot be ignored.

As the debate intensifies, one thing is certain: Luna’s demand for a total ban on dual citizens in Congress has changed the conversation in Washington. Powerful lawmakers are scrambling to clarify their status, foreign governments are watching nervously, and the American public is demanding answers. Whether Luna’s proposal becomes law or not, it has exposed a critical fault line in American politics—one that will shape the future of Congress for years to come.